UN

Union

Ended

Union was a blockchain blockchain project that conducted an initial coin offering in the 2017-2019 era.

Reviewed by TheTokener Research Team

Blockchain

Ethereum

DisclaimerThis article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Crypto and ICO investments are high-risk. Full disclaimer.

This is an archival review of Union, a cryptocurrency project that raised capital through a token sale during the 2017-2019 ICO era. The blockchain space was a common target for blockchain projects during this period.

Union vs Competitors

The blockchain vertical attracted multiple blockchain projects during the ICO era, each claiming to have identified the most important problem to solve. Union's positioning relative to competitors depended on specificity — the more precisely it defined its target customer and use case, the more defensible its pitch became.

The Union Token

The project issued a native token on Ethereum that served as the primary medium of exchange within its ecosystem. Token holders could use it to pay for services, participate in governance decisions, or stake it to earn rewards depending on the specific mechanics the team implemented.

Team and Advisors

The Union team positioned themselves at the intersection of blockchain industry knowledge and blockchain development capability. This dual expertise mattered because the hardest part of building a successful token project was rarely the technical implementation — it was achieving real-world adoption in an industry that had not asked to be disrupted.

Lessons from the ICO Era

Looking back at the ICO era, the projects that succeeded shared certain characteristics: a specific, defensible use case; a team that had genuinely relevant expertise; tokenomics that created real incentives rather than artificial scarcity; and the operational discipline to survive the 2018 bear market. Projects that lacked these qualities rarely made it to 2020.

Our Assessment of Union

Union sits in a large category of blockchain projects that raised capital in good faith during the ICO era and then faced the reality of building in a collapsing market. Whether the project represents a cautionary tale or a quiet success story depends on execution data that is not publicly available at this time.

Market Conditions

After the peak of the ICO cycle in early 2018, secondary market prices for most tokens collapsed. Exchange listings that had seemed like milestones quickly became sources of downward price pressure as early investors looked for exits. Union's token, like most from this era, would have experienced significant price discovery in these conditions.

ICO Era Context

The period when Union raised capital was one of extraordinary liquidity in the crypto markets. Bitcoin had passed $10,000 for the first time in late 2017, and the wealth effect was driving capital into everything from established protocols to brand-new projects with little more than a whitepaper. Union operated in this environment.

How Union Worked

Union targeted a genuine pain point in blockchain: the difficulty of establishing trust between strangers at scale. Traditional solutions required reputation systems, escrow services, or legal contracts — all slow and expensive. The project's smart contract infrastructure promised to handle this automatically.

Our Verdict

Our review of Union reflects the information available from the project's active period. The blockchain use case was genuine, and the project approached its ICO with the documentation and community engagement that was standard for legitimate projects of the era. Current status is unknown from public sources. This is not financial advice.

Note: This project was active around 2017-2019. Limited independent documentation is available. Information has been compiled from publicly available archived sources.

* This page may contain affiliate links. See our disclosure policy.