Friendz6ab was a social blockchain project that conducted an initial coin offering in the 2017-2019 era.
Reviewed by TheTokener Research Team
Blockchain
Ethereum
DisclaimerThis article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Crypto and ICO investments are high-risk. Full disclaimer.
Friendz6ab entered the crypto market during one of its most turbulent and creative periods. This review covers the project's background, token model, and the broader context in which it operated.
The bear market of 2018 was a Darwinian filter for the ICO generation. Projects with working products, strong communities, and lean operations tended to survive; those with bloated teams, token prices anchored to bull-market expectations, and no clear path to adoption largely did not. Friendz6ab entered this environment alongside thousands of competitors.
The environment that produced Friendz6ab was unlike anything that had come before in startup fundraising. Token sales bypassed traditional gatekeepers entirely, allowing teams to raise directly from a global retail audience. For social projects, this was particularly significant — it meant they could fund development without first convincing venture capitalists who often had little understanding of the sector.
What separated Friendz6ab from a generic "blockchain for social" pitch was its specific focus on the incentive layer. Rather than simply replicating existing processes on a distributed ledger, the project designed a token economy intended to change the behaviour of participants in ways that improved outcomes for everyone.
Friendz6ab was a product of its time — a team with conviction that blockchain could improve social, operating in a fundraising environment that rewarded ambition and vision over proven traction. Whether the project succeeded in building anything lasting is a question better answered by the team than by a review written from archived sources.
For participants who held tokens from this era, the experience was instructive regardless of the outcome. It demonstrated the importance of due diligence, the risks of investing based on whitepapers and social proof rather than working products, and the way that speculative bubbles can compress years of lessons into months.
Friendz6ab positioned itself as a social protocol built on Ethereum, using token incentives to bootstrap a decentralised network that could operate without relying on a single controlling entity.
What happened to Friendz6ab after its token sale reflects a broader pattern across the ICO generation. Some projects delivered working products and found niches within the crypto ecosystem. Others rebranded, pivoted to different markets, or quietly wound down as funding ran out and the core team moved on.
Friendz6ab was not the only team targeting social during this period. Several competing ICOs made similar pitches to similar investors, which created pressure to differentiate not just on technology but on team credibility, advisor networks, and the depth of the whitepaper. Projects that stood out tended to have specific, defensible use cases rather than broad "blockchain for everything" proposals.
Token sales operated under significant legal uncertainty during the 2017-2019 period. Teams typically relied on "utility token" classifications to avoid securities law, but regulators in the US and Europe increasingly challenged this framing. The legal landscape that emerged made it harder for projects to argue that their tokens had no investment characteristics.
Friendz6ab was a product of the 2017-2019 ICO cycle — ambitious, speculative, and operating in a regulatory environment that had not yet caught up with the technology. Whether it delivered on its promises is difficult to assess without direct input from the team. We recommend treating this review as historical context rather than a current assessment.
* This page may contain affiliate links. See our disclosure policy.